High Court rejects extending vicarious liability beyond employment

By: Richard Leder OAM, Sean O’Connor, Rhyse Collins and Deniz Coskundag Bird v DP [2024] HCA 41 | View previous article summarising the decision At a glance The High Court unanimously found that the Diocese of Ballarat was not vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of one of its priests against the respondent when he […]

Breaking: Historic decision handed down by the High Court of Australia

At a glance This morning the High Court of Australia handed down three groundbreaking judgments in the institutional abuse space – Bird v DP, RC v Salvation Army (WA) Property Trust and Willmot v State of QLD. These decisions will have a significant impact on the ability of abuse survivors to recover damages and will […]

Damages update: Victorian Court of Appeal reassesses damages in historical abuse case

By: Jonathan Maher and Tushka Sridharan At a glance The Court of Appeal reduced the jury’s $1.1 million award of pain and suffering damages to $550,000, deeming the original amount “manifestly excessive”, aligning it with judge-alone awards in similar cases. The jury’s $1.3 million exemplary damages award was set aside entirely, with the Court of […]

Stay applications in a post-GLJ world

By: Richard Leder, Samantha Saad and Michelle Rich Domenic Colbert (a pseudonym) v Trustees of the Christian Brothers [2024] VSC 309 At a glance On 13 June 2024, the Supreme Court of Victoria delivered its decision in Domenic Colbert (a pseudonym) v Trustees of the Christian Brothers [2024] VSC 309, dismissing the defendant’s application for a […]

A warning to other prospective defamation plaintiffs who escape the lions’ den and are tempted to go back for their hat – lessons learned from the Lehrmann case

By: Richard Leder, Georgie Austin, Blake Pappas and Bella Marazita The Federal Court’s decision in Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Lehrmann case) serves as another cautionary tale for prospective plaintiffs who are tempted to use defamation litigation as a vehicle to challenge serious allegations of criminal wrongdoing in order to vindicate themselves. The Lehrmann […]

The benefits of a trauma informed approach to sensitive claims: Advantages for all parties

It is well known that institutions have seen an exponential increase in civil claims arising from child abuse. However, with increased awareness and the MeToo movement, adult survivors are also finding the courage to make claims. For those of us who work in this space, much focus is placed on taking a trauma informed approach […]

Accessing student and counselling records: Requests to educational institutions

Schools and educational institutions do more than just educate students. They provide support and assist with student welfare needs, such as counselling. Therefore, student records contain more than just academic results and attendances. So how should a school or educational institution respond when it receives requests for records relating to a current or former student? […]

Year in review – major developments in abuse law

By: Patrick Thompson and Gemma Burke Close to 10 years after the Royal Commission handed down its final report, civil claims for damages arising from child abuse remain a contested, difficult, but important area of law. As more claims are advanced that push against the margins, obtaining clear guidance from the Courts is critical to […]

Third successful permanent stay application run to judgment in Queensland

DJW v State of Queensland [2023] QSC 138 At a glance On 19 October 2023, the Supreme Court of Queensland handed down its decision to permanently stay the proceedings in an historic abuse claim. The claim involved a psychiatric injury that was alleged to have developed due to the sexual and physical abuse of an […]

Vicarious liability for unlawful acts beyond child abuse?

Garrett v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2022] VSC 623 and Schokman v CCIG Investments Pty Ltd [2022] QCA 38 Two recent decisions – with quite different outcomes – suggest the courts are still grappling with the difficult question of in what circumstances an employer should be found vicariously liable for the wrongful acts of an employee. […]